Well, this may not be the correct place for this question but I thought it was close enough.
I have a stock Smiths tach in my car (TCS). I recently read that when tuning, do not trust the tach in the car but use an accurate tach. Well, the only other tach I have is a dwell-tach (the All American Dwell-Tach on sale on ebay from several people such as this guy:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/164891959400?hash=item266453a068:g:WQ8AAOSwSktgtSw5). It was cheap when I bought it over forty years ago but the few times I needed to use it back then, it seemed to be pretty accurate. In fact, I remember being surprised how accurate I thought it was but I don't remember what I was comparing it against so I don't trust my memory as evidence that it's accurate. Well, I've noticed that it reads about 200 rpm less than my Smiths tach and now I'm left wondering which is accurate (presuming one of them is!).
I would note that my Smiths tach has not been altered even though I am running a Pertronix ignition. Interestingly, when I went from a light ignition (Allison IIRC), which drove it crazy over about 4000 rpm, to the Ignitor I, my tach behaved much better. Now that I have an Ignitor II, it seems to behave itself up to about 5000 rpm and then it goes crazy. But when I'm tuning, I don't get up that high so I'm not sure that should concern me.
So the question is which one should I trust? Or can I trust either of them for best accuracy? I would think that the circuitry for determining rpm from the ignition (which both the Smiths and my dwell-tach use) would be well known to "everybody" and that even a cheap dwell-tach like mine should be trusted. On the other hand, it would surely be known by Smiths too, and so I should be able to trust it also. But then they differ.
Thoughts out there?