Very interesting, Richard!!
I think years ago, Richard told me (I'm sorry I don't remember all the specifics) that when you rebuild the rack (presumably using used Spitfire parts) that the the center (straight ahead) would be a bit looser than either side. When I rebuilt my rack - actually I added the Lotus rack parts to a "lightly" used Spitfire rack because it was nicer than mine - I noticed that even though my Spitfire rack was only 40,000 miles old, it exhibited that same pattern. I assumed that it was because of wear but I didn't expect it because the Spitfire rack wasn't much over 20,000 miles older than mine and that didn't seem like enough mileage to cause that much wear (?). When it came to shimming the cap nut, I sort of split the difference between being too tight and too loose, I basically shimmed it so that if I added one more thin shim (0.004), I could feel the teeth on the rack when turning the pinion.
As far as any differences between the Spitfire rack and my TCS rack, I didn't see any. To my eye, they both used the same rack, pinion, rack tube, etc. (but the Spitfire rack had extended sleeve nuts, longer tie rods, and included a tube to go over the rack to reduce the total turning action). So I'm surprised that the TCS racks would be any different from other Europa or Spitfire racks. I don't see the reason for making a small change to a small number of racks when the older Europa racks and Spitfire racks (without Lotus mods) work fine. Can you tell us some more about how you found this out?