G’day BDA,
About your hypothetical re the A-arm halves being welded together at the outboard end, that makes sense, too - no mechanical engineer here though.
I was thinking through my reply when I read your phrase, “in unambiguous double shear applications”.
That’s it in a nutshell, for me.
If we were talking about a crane lifting 100 tons, then we’d be perfectly justified in wanting the hook to be attached in double shear. But I agree, our front A-arms aren’t primarily looking to perform that same discreet function.
In fact, if we were to consider function, then the existing A-arm mounting system is reasonable IMHO.
If there were another chassis plate with a through hole on the outside of the A-arm, that would complete the double shear picture.
But is that what we want?
I say, no.
If we hit a curb, it’s likely either the A-arm or the pin will bend. That’s a much better outcome than the chassis taking the full force. The same argument applies to folk who consider changing fasteners to Grade 8 to be an upgrade.
On the non-reusability of Nyloc nuts, I strongly suspect this recommendation originates from the Nyloc manufacturer and likely relates to liability issues.
The Nyloc OEM has no control over the broad range of intended applications and therefor is in no position to sanction a second or third time usage.
The other thing to consider with the half height Nyloc nut is this; if we can’t apply full torque to it, then the assembly can’t function correctly. I somehow doubt clamping the inner steel sleeve of the rubber bush is achievable with 2 - 3 threads.
I’m glad you mentioned Carroll Smith’s books. I think I’ve got the same ones and everyone with a Lotus should have them on the shelf, I reckon . . even if it’s only to figure out exactly how sneaky Colin was.