Author Topic: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?  (Read 1240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TurboFource

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Sep 2019
  • Location: Maryland
  • Posts: 2,173
Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« on: Wednesday,April 28, 2021, 02:24:40 PM »
It appears the front suspension geometry on a Twin Cam chassis is different than an S2 based on the drawing for an S2.

I measure 31.0" vs 30.360" for upper distance between points
25.125" vs 24.660" between lower points
8-7/8" vs 9.0" for the lower point from top of the frame

TC measurements listed first....done with a tape measure but within less than 1/64" (.015) error

Nothing is bent and it diagonal dimensions are identical.

Was this done when they raised the ride height to meet Fed regs :confused:
The more I do the more I find I need to do....remember your ABC’s …anything but chinesium!

Offline MRN I J

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Joined: May 2020
  • Location: Knowle, Solihull, West Midlands, UK
  • Posts: 259
    • Four Ashes Garage
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday,April 28, 2021, 02:49:12 PM »
I once plotted the camber change on my S2 just to see how my tyres were going to behave on the car in roll, figures long gone now
Regards Chris

other cars inc wifes cars
Aston Martin DB MkIII DHC (wifes)
Aston Martin DB2 Saloon (shared)
MkI Austin Cooper S with less than 50k miles on it
Oldest existing LR Discovery S3, one of 1st 125 hand built cars
Peugeot 406 with less than 55k miles on it

Offline gideon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Joined: Dec 2017
  • Location: Northern NJ
  • Posts: 553
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday,April 28, 2021, 05:21:23 PM »
Turbo - this article gives some explanation of the things they changed for the Twin Cam, straight from the horses mouth too.

https://drive-my.com/under-the-skin-of-the-lotus-europa-twin-cam/


Offline TurboFource

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Sep 2019
  • Location: Maryland
  • Posts: 2,173
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday,April 28, 2021, 06:17:35 PM »
Thanks Gideon! They did change the geometry.
The more I do the more I find I need to do....remember your ABC’s …anything but chinesium!

Offline jbcollier

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Nov 2013
  • Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Posts: 5,968
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday,April 28, 2021, 07:44:29 PM »
They changed the ride height at the front and then lowered the floor for more headroom.  Geometry-wise, suspension arms fit across the range with the exception of the S1 and early S2 upper rear arms.

Offline TurboFource

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Sep 2019
  • Location: Maryland
  • Posts: 2,173
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #5 on: Sunday,May 23, 2021, 05:41:05 PM »
I now read that Lotus also changed steering rack spacers on the Twin Cam and Special to improve bump steer in addition to suspension geometry changes. So does a Twin Cam handle better than the S1/S2? Any skidpad numbers available?
The more I do the more I find I need to do....remember your ABC’s …anything but chinesium!

Offline jbcollier

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Nov 2013
  • Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Posts: 5,968
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #6 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 10:01:47 AM »
The S1/2 extend the rack by adding spacers at the outer tie rod end.  The TC/S use spacers to extend the inner tie rod end out to where it is roughly inline with the a-arm pivots.  In the straight ahead position, this reduces bump steer.  This is important in racing but less so on the road.

With identical tires, the S1/2 would give higher skid pad numbers due to being lighter than the TC/S.

Offline TurboFource

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Sep 2019
  • Location: Maryland
  • Posts: 2,173
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #7 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 12:10:41 PM »
Thanks JB
The more I do the more I find I need to do....remember your ABC’s …anything but chinesium!

Offline MRN I J

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Joined: May 2020
  • Location: Knowle, Solihull, West Midlands, UK
  • Posts: 259
    • Four Ashes Garage
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #8 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 12:51:23 PM »
The S1/2 extend the rack by adding spacers at the outer tie rod end.  The TC/S use spacers to extend the inner tie rod end out to where it is roughly inline with the a-arm pivots.  In the straight ahead position, this reduces bump steer.  This is important in racing but less so on the road.

With identical tires, the S1/2 would give higher skid pad numbers due to being lighter than the TC/S.

So the spacers screw on to the rack bar & extend the ball joint position, by how much JB
« Last Edit: Monday,May 24, 2021, 12:53:45 PM by MRN I J »
Regards Chris

other cars inc wifes cars
Aston Martin DB MkIII DHC (wifes)
Aston Martin DB2 Saloon (shared)
MkI Austin Cooper S with less than 50k miles on it
Oldest existing LR Discovery S3, one of 1st 125 hand built cars
Peugeot 406 with less than 55k miles on it

Offline jbcollier

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Nov 2013
  • Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Posts: 5,968
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #9 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 03:44:46 PM »
Good question, don't know for sure.  Would assume they extend the same amount as the S1/s ones.

Offline dakazman

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jun 2016
  • Location: Florida
  • Posts: 4,226
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #10 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 05:15:04 PM »
   Thanks guys for bringing up a subject I really never heard of. Reading through a list of Google hits I found myself being drawn into being a wheel man and not a builder. Having driven literarymadness’s car I loved the handling in a turn.  My entire suspension is in place but not setup or serviced.  I will not race mine or test the limits so what should one , as a builder shoot for? 
  My only suspension / steering problem was on my corvette.  having the power steering shims set to high  and  when driving went lock to lock in a slight motion. Fun at 40mph in 2nd gear 🤪

Dakazman
 
 
 

Offline GavinT

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Oct 2016
  • Location: Queensland, Oz
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #11 on: Monday,May 24, 2021, 05:43:57 PM »
Years ago I cut 'n' shut an S2 rack to remedy the bump steer. Only later did we discover the TC/S used longer rack sleeve nuts to achieve the same thing.
The added rack length provided on the TC/S is about 3.25 inches in total, so reasonably substantial. I don't have precise measurements to hand.

It's also possible to raise the stock rack to effect a similar result but that requires the rack mounts be positioned horizontally as distinct from their stock vertical mounting on the front of the T.
The internal metal work kinda gets in the way, otherwise. Shims are used to attain the final position and equalise both sides.

Offline 4129R

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: May 2014
  • Location: Norfolk, United Kingdom, not far from Hethel the home of Lotus.
  • Posts: 2,735
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #12 on: Saturday,July 13, 2024, 08:49:02 AM »
The S1/2 extend the rack by adding spacers at the outer tie rod end.  The TC/S use spacers to extend the inner tie rod end out to where it is roughly inline with the a-arm pivots.

I was advised that the tie rod ball joint should be in line with the top and bottom arms suspension pivot points.

I have measured mine on a TCS, and the steering rack is about 20mm longer each side than the in line with suspension pivot length should be.

Is this normal, or are my spacers too long? Will this longer tie rod length give bump steer and straight line instability?

Offline 4129R

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: May 2014
  • Location: Norfolk, United Kingdom, not far from Hethel the home of Lotus.
  • Posts: 2,735
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #13 on: Sunday,July 14, 2024, 02:50:56 AM »
I have just found all the dimensions for the steering rack in the workshop manual section H page 7. 

The whole length centre tie rod ball joint to centre tie rod ball joint should be 1,224.50mm and centre rack ball joint to rack ball joint should be 698.50 mm with the two tie rods being each 263mm long including the tie rod end.

Time to take some measurements.

Offline 4129R

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: May 2014
  • Location: Norfolk, United Kingdom, not far from Hethel the home of Lotus.
  • Posts: 2,735
Re: Twin Cam front suspension geometry different than S2?
« Reply #14 on: Sunday,July 14, 2024, 04:23:02 AM »
Well I have just measured the steering rack.

As you would expect, the total length is correct at 1224.5mm, but my tie rods are much shorter than the workshop manual dimension 1 on page 7, Section H. The manual says they should be 263mm, but mine are only 225mm long. That in effect means that they do not line up with the centres of the top and bottom suspension arms, so I have the potential of around 40mm of out of line bump steer.

Is the workshop manual correct? Are these dimensions for a TC or an S2 which may be different?

My manual has these dimensions:-

1    263.0mm
2    30.04mm
3    85.85mm
4    26.16mm
5  432.56mm

Therefore the dimension from the centre of the pinion/steering column to the shorter track rod end = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 409.05mm.

I am confused.