Almost a complete new front suspension…O/H'd spax with new bushings…shorter (125 lb) springs…new sway bar/shock attach bushings, new washers and nylocs, overhauled trunnions, new ball joints...painted arms, sway bar, brake back plate, overhauled calipers, new greenstuff pads, stainless pistons and new seals, new front bearings...what a $&88@;? pain torquing the suspension without a lift.
Replacing the ball joints, bushings, freshening up the trunnions, new roll bar rubbers..feels tighter than before. Of course, on the bomb-cratered streets of my town, the dampers get a workout, so next stop is the interstate to see if the tendency of the front to wander a bit has been cured on decent tarmac. On just the short ride (I still have to install the close plate...which provides the ground route for electrical stuff in the front...right now, my blinkahs don't blink, horn doesn't horn, and probably the rad fan is out of service), the front end does feel more 'connected' than before...so, that's good, right?
Just as a data point, and totally inaccurate...there is a little under “2 fingers” (about 1"/25 mm) clearance between top of front arch and tread level at same point which is a little less than the stroke on the spax before it hits the rubber bump stop. Before starting this a few weeks ago...it was 3 fingers easily between top of the tire and bottom of the top wheel arch. So, nose IS lower. No, didn't pull out the engineer rule or laser measuring device. Car wasn't designed to that level of accuracy, so why start as long as it's safe. I leave that to the TV renovation guys. Front long pins and bottom of shock torqued to 55 ft/lbs, other setting as per the manual. Still haven't sussed out the brakes yet (they were rebled with the Gunson equipment...so have pedal...), still on the OEM...see if that works for a while...but have a .70 triumph and an F10 sitting on the shelf...so, I have brakes to get to the show...I'll worry about apres' show after. Next step...after the show...engine and tranny OUT.