I considered that but dismissed it without checking. I just checked and Wikipedia says I'm about 320 ft. above sea level. I could be higher but not enough to make a difference.
Would you say that 4% is an acceptable error?
Hi there,
Personally I'd say 4% on an old instrument is well within reason. We're so used to digital displays now that we expect that if the gauge says 99C or 43psi then it's exactly 99C or 43psi, plus or minus nothing. But back in the 60s when these things were made ? If a temperature gauge went into red or steam came out then we'd worry but otherwise I think we'd just be happy and carry on. Even now, as long as mine stops roughly around the same point on the dial I'm perfectly happy whether it's the indicated 85C or not.
As an aside, over in the UK the law used to allow a 10% margin on speedometers, so if you were doing 32mph in a 30 zone you'd be ok. 34mph and the officer might sharpen his pencil if he was having a really bad day. In another life I remember being told "+/- 5% experimental accuracy" was reasonable, although of course these days we expect much more with modern techniques.
But.... these are 50yr old designs even if this is a new reproduction made yesterday.
So I'd leave it alone. If selling I would proudly state in the advert "functioning and tested in boiling water" I would show a picture of the gauge reading 96C alongside a digital thermometer if you have one. (those £2 things from Ebay for cooking are surprisingly useful at times) The buyer will see what they're getting. If they wish to recalibrate they can, but I'll bet they won't bother.
Brian